|
Apr 3 2012, 5:54 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
4 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: Under ConstructionIntroductionThere are a number of practices in radiography that are so widely accepted that they can be considered to be fundamental tenets of the
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2011)
|
|
Feb 7 2010, 6:26 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: takenproduced is up to your standards (or your department's standards), it should be based on a balanced consideration of whether the repeat view is likely
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2013)
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 6:48 AM EST
|
|
|
lock |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Locked by Feb 1 2010, 6:48 AM EST for: no reason given
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 6:47 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
3 words added
3 words deleted
|
|
Change: modeledmodelled by a relationship known as the “Linear Hypothesis”. The assertion is that every radiation dose of any magnitude can produce some level of detrimental effects which may be manifested as an increased risk of genetic mutations and cancer.http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/radiation/forms/alara.pdfAn important application of the
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2013)
|
|
Jan 7 2010, 7:45 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
30 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: Another routine comparison view practiced in some centres is morethe skyline view of the knee- clearit is thatnot routineunusual to see imaging of both sides for comparison.Routine comparison views in appendicular skeleton radiography are generally not justified. The aim with comparison
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2012)
|
|
Jan 7 2010, 7:41 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
138 words added
2 images added
|
|
Change: This chest X-ray image (left) arrived with a patient who was transferred from a regional hospital. The radiograph did not have a patient name or
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1988)
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 11:13 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
11 words added
16 words deleted
|
|
Change: you need to havethere veryare good reasonreasons for not having other professional groups present.present- If you have Radiologiststhis present,is it'speer noreview longernot peerRadiologist review.Providing lunch is a big drawcard! ... back to the Applied Radiography home page...
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1845)
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 11:10 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
1 image added
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 1851)
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 11:07 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
9 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: examination where possible. This requirement is based on the premise that you should fully understand what you are trying to achieve before you start a radiographic examination. It is often the case that viewing old imaging will influence the radiographic examination- sometimes in subtle ways...sometimes in profound ways.Viewing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1851)
|
|
Jan 4 2010, 5:06 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
21 words added
15 words deleted
|
|
Change: and releases of radioactive materials by employing all reasonable methods.Current radiation safety philosophy is based on the conservative assumption that radiation dose and its biological effects on living tissues
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1849)
|
|
Jan 3 2010, 7:54 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
323 words added
9 words deleted
|
|
Change: This process is relatively straightforward in a PACS environment. You could use a folder system where radiographers enter cases for discussion in a radiographers meeting
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1839)
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 10:31 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
3 words added
3 words deleted
|
|
Change: clinically-focusedpatient-focused approach to radiography rather than a picture-focused approach. That is to say, the focus of your radiographic pursuits should be based around achieving a
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1516)
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 10:27 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
203 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: Viewing old imaging is most important in an orthopaedic clinic followup situation. Even if you think you know the correct imaging required for a particular
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1516)
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 9:13 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
82 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: If I was to provide radiographic imaging of this patient, I would want to know why the referring doctor ordered a hand X-ray rather than
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1306)
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 6:01 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
150 words added
11 words deleted
2 images added
|
|
Change: Current radiation safety philosophy is based on the conservative assumption that radiation dose and its biological effects on living tissues are modeled by a relationship
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1212)
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 10:52 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
1 image added
1 image deleted
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 1048)
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 10:43 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
1 image added
1 image deleted
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 1048)
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 7:53 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
|
|
Change: are similar issues for ? pneumothorax, ? aspirated foreign body, ? pulled elbow ?constipation ?abdominal hernia etc etc Peer Review ... back to the Applied Radiography home page... back to the Wikiradiography home page
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1048)
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 7:50 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
4 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: the order of importance/empasis will vary from institution to institution.At least one Joint Demonstrated on Every Longbone ImageThe radiographic demonstration of a longbone without the demonstration of either joint is a disturbing sight.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1046)
|
|
Jan 1 2010, 7:49 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
305 words added
3 words deleted
1 image added
|
|
Change: A clinical approach to radiography will affect your decision to repeat a view- the question to be asked is not simply whether the image you
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1042)
|