Sign in or 

| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | erect abdominal imaging | 0 | Nov 24 2008, 3:40 AM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 24 2008, 3:40 AM EST
Watch
thank's as posting it..
that's so great for learning.. the abdominal x ray are so good and with explanations.. really help me in the process of learning.. intestinal obstruction.. |
||||||
| iamcolintaylor | Erect Abdominal imaging | 1 | Oct 28 2008, 3:01 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||||
|
Thread started: Oct 23 2008, 7:19 PM EDT
Watch
Great page, thanks for posting it.
I worked as a radiographer in a largeUK teaching hospital for 13 years and was never, repeat, never asked to perform an erector decubitus abdominal projection (contrast studies excepted). Any ? perforation request had a supine abdomen and erect chest (don't even get me started on routine lateral chests!). As far as I'm aware, UK departments generally do not perform erect abdominal projections. So what does this mean? Are the GI radiologists and surgeons I worked with in the UK remiss or negligent in working without the erect views? I doubt it. I think more likely is that the supine view almost always gives as much information as the erect view - it's just more difficult to interpret. I don't doubt the erect view is useful, but you could argue that case to add projections to any examination. The important question is, is it really needed? Like any radiographer, I want to assist in providing diagnoses for patients, whilst avoiding harming them. It's demoralising to be forced to routinely expose patients to at least double the radiation dose they'd get if they presented to a UK hospital with the same complaint.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||