|
Jul 21 2009, 9:59 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
13 words added
|
|
Change: unit.This baby has atelectasis of the left lung associated with an ET tube in the RMB. The monitor artifact is partly obscuring the tip of the ETT.There are multiple scratch marks on the film pre-processing ...back to the Wikiradiography home page...baxck to the Applied Radiography home page
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1297)
|
|
Jul 21 2009, 9:56 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
38 words added
40 words deleted
|
|
Change: (leaves you wondering how wide the cones were). I believe LBDs were around in 1961.The "R" at the end of the ID number should be on the patient's right side.Tension pneumperitoneum notedConing IIThis image is circa 1970s. I suspect
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1284)
|
|
Dec 14 2008, 8:01 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
49 words added
|
|
Change: Air in portal venous branches can be associated with umbilical venous catheter insertion. Inconsequential transient portal venous air can be seen immediately after umbilical venous catheter insertion and should not necessarily be attributed to necrotizing enterocolitis. Alan E. Schlesinger1, Richard M. Braverman1 and Michael A. DiPietro2 AJR 2003; 180:1147-1153Cassette
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1278)
|
|
Dec 14 2008, 4:33 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
13 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: The artifact in the RLQ is the umbilicus and umbilical cord clamphttp://pregnancy.about.com/od/newbornbabies/ss/cordcare_2.htmThis image is circa 1966 with manual processing. Note the characteristic rounded corners of the film.There are several valid criticisms/observations that can be levelled at this radiographthere is only one cone mark visiblethe
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1227)
|
|
Dec 14 2008, 4:27 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
3 words added
1 word deleted
1 image added
|
|
Change: therapy)...see belowthere is a circular artifact that is produced by a hole in the perspex of the isolette (lower white arrow). http://www.flickr.com/photos/71774835@N00/94691534/Coning IThis image is circa 1961. Once again it is taken using film/screen technology and manual processing. Note the followingthere are no
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1206)
|
|
Dec 13 2008, 6:52 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
3 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: of screen is simply to large for use in the Neonatal Unit. You don't want to cone out to include this relatively large marker. The marker on the leftright is the type used by the radiographers at the Adelaide
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1196)
|
|
Dec 13 2008, 6:31 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
53 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: allows the radiographer to shape the beam to the baby's chest shape. This coning may be too tight for some centres that require more of the baby's upper airway to be included in the image.Radiographic TechniqueSide MarkersSide markers in the neonatal unit
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1194)
|
|
Dec 13 2008, 6:22 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
213 words added
213 words deleted
4 images added
4 images deleted
|
|
Change: there is a circular artifact that is produced by a hole in the perspex of the isolette (lower white arrow). Coning IThis image is circa 1961. Once again it is taken using film/screen technology and manual processing. Note the followingthere are no cone marks
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1138)
|
|
Dec 13 2008, 6:15 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
70 words added
70 words deleted
1 image added
1 image deleted
|
|
Change: Pathology and patient rotation can make this very difficult. This patient's faintly visible left ventricle and nasogastric tube help, but what if the patient had situs inversus? The UVC tip has tracked into the liver and there appears to be faint portal venous gas.Cassette Name WindowIf you
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1138)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 6:44 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
27 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: removal of ECG dots prior to chest radiography in the neonatal unit. This baby has atelectasis of the left lung associated with an ET tube in the RMB. The monitor artifact is partly obscuring the tip of the ETT.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1138)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 6:18 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
38 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: some tube angle would help to correct the rotation ArtifactsThis is check film on a central line placement. The central line is partly obscured by the ECG dot. This image presents the case for removal of ECG dots prior to chest radiography in the neonatal unit.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1111)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 5:26 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
36 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: This image is circa 1970s. I suspect it is a chest X-ray and the coning is awful.Note alsoendotracheal tube down right main bronchusatelectasis left lungskin fold over left lungSide MarkersYou should not rely on your ability to
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1073)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 1:45 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
38 words added
21 words deleted
|
|
Change: It could be argued that the exposure used demonstrated the kinked NGT. Skin FoldsThis is a non-digital film-screen radiograph. There are a number of issues with this imagethe projection is apical. Note that the baby's clavicles are projected
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1036)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 1:36 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: usedskilled toin handling thembe careful to avoid patient rotation, particularly with chest radiographyuse a side marker (see Baker Cone)- left and right are not always clear from the anatomy, particularly in chest radiographycheck departmental protocol re removal of ECG leadsthink about
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1017)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 12:10 AM EST
|
|
|
lock |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Locked by Dec 12 2008, 12:10 AM EST for: no reason given
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 12:09 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
50 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: RotationThis baby is lying in a slightly LPO position. You need a critical eye to pick up this rotation which may not be that obvious at the time of exposure. A folded up cleaning cloth under the left shoulder or some tube angle would help to crrect the rotation
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1017)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 12:03 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
18 words added
|
|
Change: it is taken. Pathology and patient rotation can make this very difficult. This patients faintly visible left ventricle and nasogastric tube help, but what if the patient has situs inversus? The UVC tip which has tracked into the liver and there appears to be faint portal venous air
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 967)
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 12:01 AM EST
|
|
|
edit |
55 words added
5 words deleted
1 image added
|
|
Change: MarkersYou should not rely on your ability to establish which is the correct left-right orientation of the image after it is taken. Pathology and patient rotation can make this very difficult. This patients faintly visible left ventricle and nasogastric tube help, but what if the patient has situs inversus?
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 949)
|
|
Dec 11 2008, 11:51 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
60 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: This image is circa 1961. Once again it is taken using film/screen technology and manual processing. Note the followingthere are no cone marks (leaves you wondering how wide the cones were). I believe LBDs were around in 1969.The "R" at the end of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 898)
|
|
Dec 11 2008, 11:41 PM EST
|
|
|
edit |
77 words added
1 image added
|
|
Change: This image is circa 1966 with film/screen and manual processing. Note the manual processing characteristic radiused corners. There are several valid criticisms/observations that can be levelled at this radiographthere is only one cone mark visiblethe operator's fingers are in the imagethe top artifact (white
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 836)
|