Sign in or 

Question 1Is there any pathology demonstrated?Question 2Is any further imaging of the pelvis warranted?![]()
|
M.J.Fuller |
Latest page update: made by M.J.Fuller
, Jan 23 2012, 8:32 PM EST
(about this update
About This Update
60 words added 1 image added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gajaal | Trauma Pelvis on 60 yo | 0 | Mar 21 2012, 10:34 PM EDT by Gajaal | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 21 2012, 10:34 PM EDT
Watch
Bilateral #s of public rami and ?? right lateral aspect of ilium adjacent Rt ASIS. Project of whole pelvis would have been valuable to assess Iliac crests but if going to CT not necessary to re-expose.
|
|||||
| xraygirl98 | Answer | 0 | Mar 20 2012, 2:44 PM EDT by xraygirl98 | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 20 2012, 2:44 PM EDT
Watch
Looks like FX's ischial tuberosity and superior Rami. Would get CT scan
|
|||||
| Englander66 | Answer | 0 | Feb 19 2012, 7:13 PM EST by Englander66 | ||
|
Thread started: Feb 19 2012, 7:13 PM EST
Watch
1. As above
2. No further imaging necessary unless clinically indicated. Await comprensive evaluation by othopaedic team. |
|||||