Sign in or 

Question 1Is there any pathology demonstrated?Question 2Is any further imaging of the pelvis warranted?![]()
|
M.J.Fuller |
Latest page update: made by M.J.Fuller
, Jan 23 2012, 8:32 PM EST
(about this update
About This Update
60 words added 1 image added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Englander66 | Answer | 0 | Sunday, 7:13 PM EST by Englander66 | ||
|
Thread started: Sunday, 7:13 PM EST
Watch
1. As above
2. No further imaging necessary unless clinically indicated. Await comprensive evaluation by othopaedic team. |
|||||
| drshahdhar | Answer | 0 | Sunday, 6:01 AM EST by drshahdhar | ||
|
Thread started: Sunday, 6:01 AM EST
Watch
1/ # pubic ramus ,left
2/ CT for further evaluation |
|||||